![]() ![]() Our database of China Initiative cases draws primarily on the press releases that have been added to the DOJ’s China Initiative webpage over the last three years, including those recently removed from its public pages. “This is resulting in a brain drain from and distrust towards the United States, which is counter-productive to national security.” What our data show “Essentially, national security issues are being used as a pretext to target our community. They also demonstrate the “disproportionate impact on Asian Americans and the immigrant community,” said Gisela Kusakawa, a staff attorney at Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, an advocacy group. ![]() Our findings highlight “the disconnect between the theory behind the China Initiative and the prosecutions that are brought in practice,” said Ashley Gorski, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project. This included several instances where the government had announced prosecutions with great fanfare, only for the cases to fail-including one that was dismissed by a judge after a mistrial. Two days after MIT Technology Review requested comment from the DOJ regarding the initiative, the department made significant changes to its own list of cases, adding some and deleting 39 defendants previously connected to the China Initiative from its website. What you have are numbers, and it is startling to see what are.” “Whenever we ask for data, they usually don’t give it back to us. The Justice Department is “intentionally obtuse with us and will not address specific cases,” said Representative Judy Chu, a Democrat from California. Lawmakers say our findings are “startling.” Two days after MIT Technology Review requested comment from the DOJ regarding the initiative, the department made significant changes to its own list of cases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |